Study: Regional nuclear war would trigger global famine

Even regional nuclear war would trigger global famine

A malnourished child lies in a hospital in Yemen.  According to a study, a regional nuclear war could hunger the world

A malnourished child lies in a hospital in Yemen. According to a study, a regional nuclear war could trigger global famine.

© Mohammed Mohammed / XinHua / DPA

Even a regional nuclear war could trigger global famine and claim countless lives. This emerges from model calculations by researchers at a university in New Jersey.

Even a regional one nuclear war, for example between India and Pakistan, could trigger famines worldwide. This emerges from model calculations that have simulated the effects of such a war caused by soot particles in the upper atmosphere.

The soot would block some of the sunlight and result in crop failures. Researchers led by Lili Xia and Alan Robock from Rutgers University in New Brunswick (New Jersey, United States) presented their findings in the journal “Nature Food”. The study was submitted to the journal back in 2021 and published months later through the usual review process.

Study: Regional nuclear war would trigger global famine

“In a nuclear war, bombs aimed at cities and industrial areas would unleash firestorms and eject large amounts of soot into the upper atmosphere, which would spread globally and rapidly cool the planet,” write the scientists, three of whom are am Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research are active. Advances in modeling global changes as a result of climate change have made simulations like those in this study possible. However, the consequences of a nuclear war would materialize much faster than in the case of climate change.

Xia, Robock and colleagues designed several wartime scenarios and simulated the impact on the production of a selected number of foods over the next ten years. In all scenarios, domestic food shortages cause all nations to halt food exports; the global food trade would come to a standstill. On this basis, the researchers calculated how many calories would still be available per person in individual countries and how many people would die of starvation.

100 atomic bombs would hit almost 280 million people directly and indirectly

In the smallest calculated scenario, 100 nuclear bombs with an explosive force of 15,000 tons each would eject around five million tons of soot into the upper atmosphere. In this case, according to the simulations, 27 million people would die directly and 255 million people through famines in different regions of the world.

The researchers also calculated the effects of a nuclear war with 4,400 nuclear bombs of 100,000 tons each. This would drastically reduce available calories, in some countries by about 99 percent each. More than five billion people would die worldwide, more than half of the world’s population. The consequences of the radioactive contamination have not yet been taken into account. Food from the sea, eating insects and other food alternatives, or slaughtering all livestock would only slightly improve the situation.

“These data show us one thing: we must prevent nuclear war from ever happening,” Robock said. “If nuclear weapons exist, they can be used. Banning nuclear weapons is the only long-term solution.” The researchers have not investigated how a nuclear war could come about or various ways of preventing it.

In a comment, also in Nature Food, Deepak Ray of the University of Minnesota at Saint Paul (Minnesota, USA) writes: “This work is an advance on previous studies.” It provides new assessments of post-nuclear war food security at the national and global levels under a range of wartime scenarios. However, the number of crops included was very limited and there were some unclear individual aspects that should be analysed. All in all, however, the scientific findings from this study serve as a clear warning.

Study helps in the argument against any use of nuclear weapons

Angelika Claussen from the organization IPPNW Germany (International Doctors for the Prevention of Nuclear War) speaks of a “very good study”. Even if other consequences, such as the collapse of medical care, were not the subject of the study, the results of the simulations made the dramatic consequences for the world population clear. “That helps us in our arguments against any use of nuclear weapons and for joining the nuclear weapons ban treaty,” says Claussen. It calls on all nine nuclear powers to jointly declare that they will not use nuclear weapons for the first time. So far, only India and China have done so individually.

According to the Federation of American Scientists, the nuclear powers have a total of around 12,700 nuclear warheads, most of which are owned by Russia and the United States. India and Pakistan together have over 300 pieces.

“We deliberately did not do a sensitivity study that shows how many nuclear weapons can be used before catastrophic indirect consequences occur,” explained co-author Jonas Jägermeyr from PIK. “That would send the wrong signals.”


Source link