Reform of traffic lights does not change much



Dhe negatively connoted name "Hartz IV" is to be used with the reform to the new "citizen money" disappear. And otherwise? In addition to a 12 percent increase in cash benefits, the draft that has now been approved by the traffic light cabinet also contains some approaches to making it easier for the long-term unemployed to find their way into independent employment. Nevertheless, the project comes across as a document of indecision. That reflects the inner turmoil of the whole argument about it. However, considering the real political situation, it is not the worst result.

On the one hand, there is the old story of self-centered social organizations: the whole project is just another act of social indifference and abysmal disregard for poor people, because it is not unconditional basic income brings. And because it doesn't otherwise meet all of their demands - which, by the way, would be neither financially nor socially acceptable.

On the other hand, there is some oversimplified criticism from business and municipal representatives, who already recognize a "giving in" to those who refuse to work if the Job centre people who have recently fallen into long-term unemployment no longer have to be forced to move to a smaller apartment first. There is a plausible justification for the fact that there is now a waiting period for this. As long as there is a chance of rapid reintegration into work, the job centers should take care of that and not the frustrating relocation bureaucracy.

Helping people help themselves

The reform work that is now available is the result of the opposites of these two perspectives, which are also opposed to each other in the traffic light – with some advantages for the social associations. Politically, this inevitably leads to conceptual contradictions. And the confusion will only increase as each side is now spreading its own interpretation of the bill.



Source link