Exploding care costs: social policy in an emergency

MMore than 2400 euros a month: It goes without saying that such an invoice amount exceeds the financial leeway of many pensioners. Nevertheless, that is the amount that those in need of care in this country now have to pay for care in the home from their own means – in addition to the help they receive the contribution-financed long-term care insurance pays. So now the social welfare office has to step in for a larger number of people in need of care.

Such a system obviously has little to do with coherent social policy. The explanation of how this could happen seems almost stranger: it is the result of a social policy that has long ago taken up the cause of finally taking full action against the much-lamented “care emergency” – without clarifying exactly what mismanagement is actually behind the alleged “emergency”.

It is the result of a social policy that has since been so dedicated to the calls and wishes of the many interest groups in the care sector that they forgot something fundamental: even as a legislator, you cannot decide on higher care wages, more staffing and better care services without in the end someone has to pay for it.

This omission is now particularly a burden for those who Care are dependent. Expectations and demands on the performance of a politically controlled care system were constantly increasing – but the responsible politicians in the old and so far also in the new government avoided the key question of financing.

Now the clarification of these issues can hardly be postponed. All the more, however, the traffic light coalition should be careful not to simply continue to follow the calls of the very stakeholders who have contributed to this situation. Because their goal is basically clear: a self-governing care system that can send unlimited bills to taxpayers and contributors. Then it would be better to have a system in which the state ensures a minimum provision for everyone through social assistance – coupled with the clear message to all younger people that private provision is worthwhile.

Source link