Do not give Putin any pretext for further escalation
BSo far, strategic communication in the dispute with Russia has been one of the US government’s strengths. This initially referred to the release of intelligence about Moscow’s hybrid war planning. The White House later decided to publicly document the secret services’ contribution to military aid to Ukraine as well. The difficulties faced by the Russian attackers and the successes of the Ukrainian armed forces have probably made some government representatives overconfident. Anyway thinks President Joe Bidenthat some tongues are too loose.
That’s why he called the CIA director on Friday William Burns, National Intelligence Coordinator Avril Haines and Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin. Tenor: The most recent reports that concrete military successes in Kiev can be traced back to direct information from American services are counterproductive. Leaking information to the media must stop. Others are now calling the boast even dangerous, as it could provide Moscow with an excuse for further escalation. The Chairman of the Duma, Vyacheslav Volodin, accused Washington of “coordinating and developing essential military operations” and concluded that the United States was “directly involved in military actions against our country”.
A day after the call, CIA Director Burns said it was “irresponsible, very risky and dangerous” for people to talk too much – whether it was talking publicly about certain intelligence topics or sharing information confidentially. At a Financial Times conference in Washington, he added that it was a “big mistake” to compromise the intelligence capabilities of the Ukraine to underestimate. It’s their country, they have a lot more information than the Americans. The background to this was reports that the American services not only provided Kyiv with general information about Russian troop movements – as at the beginning of the war – but also helped to sink a Russian warship and specifically kill Russian generals. The latter was denied by the Biden government. The contribution to the sinking of the missile cruiser “Moskva” was downplayed. Despite his own admonition, Biden released more military aid to Ukraine. The State Department said a $150 million package had been approved.
Burns: Putin stews in ‘resentment, ambition and insecurity’
Burns expressed at the conference the assessment of the Russian President Wladimir Putin intensify military action as he cannot afford defeat. Despite the failure to take Kiev and the difficulties in Donbass, Putin still believes he can defeat the Ukrainian armed forces. For years he has been stewing in a highly explosive combination of “resentment, ambition and insecurity”. At the moment he is apparently “convinced that he can still make progress by intensifying the means”. But there are no signs that he plans to use tactical nuclear weapons.
Burns made it clear that the Ukraine war was not changing Washington’s actual security strategy: China was “the greatest long-term geopolitical challenge,” although Russia’s danger should not be underestimated. “Putin is demonstrating in a very disturbing way that powers on the decline can be at least as divisive as those on the rise,” Burns said. He got the impression that the Chinese President Xi Jinping was a little concerned about the damage to China’s reputation resulting from its association with Russia. Xi is also concerned about the economic uncertainties resulting from the war. Beijing was amazed that America and Europe had moved closer together during the crisis. But he doesn’t think for a second that Xi’s determination to take control of Taiwan has eroded.
Daily at 12.00 p.m
