Cocaine investigations: prosecutors disagree with Peter Fischer

Cocaine investigations: prosecutors disagree with Peter Fischer

DThe Frankfurt public prosecutor’s office has the allegations of the lawyers of the Eintracht President Peter Fisher in connection with the preliminary investigation into the suspicion of acquiring and possessing cocaine and was “surprised” by the contents of the lawyers’ letter sent on Thursday.

Catherine Iskandar

Responsible editor for the “Rhein-Main” department of the Sunday newspaper.

The schoolmate of Fischer’s son and his mother, through whom investigative proceedings got under way had been questioned twice and there was no doubt that the boy was telling the truth. Contrary to the information disseminated by the defense attorneys, there are no gross contradictions in the statements. In view of the letter, one wonders why Fischer himself did not offer to give a hair sample.

According to the lawyers’ statement, Fischer did not sleep in the bedroom where, according to the public prosecutor’s office, a drug sniffer dog had struck and with a subsequent test residual stocks of cocaine were identified on a bedside table, a spokeswoman for the authority countered: Fischer came out of this room at 7.25 a.m. “sleepy” on the morning of the search. The fact that the rapid test was positive is an “important indication” that must be taken into account.

Four “Crushers” found in the apartment

In addition, it is not correct that no consumer items were found during the search. A total of four so-called crushers were found, which are mostly used for crushing marijuana: one in a toiletry bag in a display case in the dining room along with a small amount marijuana, two in a wine rack in the dining room and one in a sports bag in the children’s room, which belonged to the housekeeper, who has since been fired by Fischer. According to the spokeswoman, the suspicious substance mentioned by the lawyers, which was found in “the smallest amount” in the housekeeper’s bed, is currently being checked.

According to her, it is also incorrect that the negative urine sample from her schoolmate was not made known to the Institute for Forensic Medicine. The Institute was provided with the complete file from which the negative sample resulted. The schoolmate’s hair sample had been submitted for examination, and the result was only expected in several weeks.

The fact that a hair sample is taken from Fischer’s 13-year-old son has that Public prosecutor not requested for reasons of proportionality. According to the information, he only used cocaine once and not like his schoolmate, who is said to have taken cocaine home with him, over a period of about a week.

“Nothing to Hide”

The public prosecutor’s office will not discontinue the proceedings because the investigations have not been completed. They would continue to be conducted solely on suspicion of acquiring and possessing cocaine. There is no suspicion that it was given to minors because there is no evidence that it was deliberately handed over. The mobile phones of Fischer, the 13-year-old son and his mother are currently being evaluated. Fischer’s lawyers had stressed that their client “openly” issued the unlock codes for all mobile phones, “since he has nothing to hide”.

Source link